lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 03/31] cpumask: remove min from first_cpu/next_cpu
Seems like this has been here forever, but I can't see why:
find_first_bit and find_next_bit both return >= NR_CPUS on failure.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

---
lib/cpumask.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- masklongs.orig/lib/cpumask.c
+++ masklongs/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -5,21 +5,20 @@

int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS));
+ return find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__first_cpu);

int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1));
+ return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu);

#if NR_CPUS > 64
int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
{
- return min_t(int, nr_cpu_ids,
- find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1));
+ return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr);
#endif
--


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-29 20:07    [W:0.198 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site