Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:02:53 -0700 | From | Mike Travis <> | Subject | [PATCH 03/31] cpumask: remove min from first_cpu/next_cpu |
| |
Seems like this has been here forever, but I can't see why: find_first_bit and find_next_bit both return >= NR_CPUS on failure.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
--- lib/cpumask.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- masklongs.orig/lib/cpumask.c +++ masklongs/lib/cpumask.c @@ -5,21 +5,20 @@ int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp) { - return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS)); + return find_first_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__first_cpu); int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp) { - return min_t(int, NR_CPUS, find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1)); + return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n+1); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu); #if NR_CPUS > 64 int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp) { - return min_t(int, nr_cpu_ids, - find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1)); + return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, nr_cpu_ids, n+1); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr); #endif --
| |