Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:17:21 -0700 | From | Mike Travis <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/31] cpumask: Provide new cpumask API |
| |
Mike Travis wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: ... > >> In what way will Rusty's changes differ? Since you incorporate some of >> Rusty's changes already, could you please iterate towards a single >> patchset which we could then start testing? > > Our timezones are not very conducive to a lot of email exchanges (and he's moving.) >>From what I've seen I believe he's leaning towards using struct cpumask * and > less trickery than I have.
Oh yeah, I forgot the other major point of Rusty's approach. He wants the patchset to be completely bisectable. That's far from true in my version.
Thanks, Mike
| |