Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:52:05 -0600 | From | Jordan Crouse <> | Subject | Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression |
| |
On 23/08/08 14:05 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Rufus & Azrael > > <rufus-azrael@numericable.fr> wrote: > >> Yinghai Lu wrote: > >>> > >>> cat /proc/timer_list > >>> > >> > >> see file attached. > >> > > .. > >> > >> Tick Device: mode: 1 > >> Clock Event Device: hpet > >> max_delta_ns: 149983003520 > >> min_delta_ns: 3352 > >> mult: 61496115 > >> shift: 32 > >> mode: 3 > >> next_event: 9223372036854775807 nsecs > >> set_next_event: hpet_legacy_next_event > >> set_mode: hpet_legacy_set_mode > >> event_handler: tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast > >> tick_broadcast_mask: 00000000 > >> tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000 > >> > > > > thanks > > > > so it works..., need to find out where is the magic bit. > > > > Jordan, or others for AMD could access SB600 > can you check ATI SB600 doc to produce one quirks patch to set the > magic bit to hide 00:14.0 BAR1 to OS ?
Hi Yinghai - sorry, I've been away from my email for a few days. I know you resolved most of the problems, but a quirk patch to get rid of the BAR all together would be a good idea. I'll send something out following the US holiday.
Jordan
-- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
| |