lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
On Sat 2008-02-02 11:13:21, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.
> > >
> > > Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the
> > > "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that
> > > "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :)
> >
> > because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it
> > makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume.
>
> I think you should have written "quick and dirty". ;)
>
> It would have been easier to just use the public interface
> and hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware
> was dirtier, and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously
> shouldn't go upstream until it gets done properly".

Yes, it was "quick and dirty". And I do not think it is going
upstream in this form...?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-02-02 20:35    [W:0.356 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site