[lkml]   [2008]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] sleepy linux self-test
    On Saturday 02 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.
    > >
    > > Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the
    > > "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that
    > > "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :)
    > because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it
    > makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume.

    I think you should have written "quick and dirty". ;)

    It would have been easier to just use the public interface
    and hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware
    was dirtier, and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously
    shouldn't go upstream until it gets done properly".

    - Dave

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-02-02 20:15    [W:0.022 / U:9.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site