lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8
From
Date
Yes - they look distinct


Steve French
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin
phone: 512-838-2294
email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com



Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
12/08/2008 02:58 PM

To
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
cc
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Dennis Hardy
<dhardy@sogetthis.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, layton@redhat.com,
Steven French/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette <holger@wizards.de>
Subject
Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8






Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@sogetthis.com>
wrote:
>>> I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under
2.6.27.8, and
>>> the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect:
...
>>> Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8? This worked
fine
>>> in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...

There were several cifs updates in .8 but AFAIU none in .7.

> FWIW, it seems to be related to this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/8/7

Holger's report is about the userland SMB/CIFS server, while Denis's is
about kernelspace client code. They look like separate issues to me.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ==-- -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-12-08 22:13    [W:1.089 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site