Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8 | From | Steven French <> | Date | Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:10:35 -0600 |
| |
Yes - they look distinct
Steve French Senior Software Engineer Linux Technology Center - IBM Austin phone: 512-838-2294 email: sfrench at-sign us dot ibm dot com
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> 12/08/2008 02:58 PM
To "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> cc Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@sogetthis.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, layton@redhat.com, Steven French/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette <holger@wizards.de> Subject Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@sogetthis.com> wrote: >>> I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under 2.6.27.8, and >>> the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect: ... >>> Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8? This worked fine >>> in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...
There were several cifs updates in .8 but AFAIU none in .7.
> FWIW, it seems to be related to this one: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/8/7
Holger's report is about the userland SMB/CIFS server, while Denis's is about kernelspace client code. They look like separate issues to me. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ==-- -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |