lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, ioremap: use %pR in printk

* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This converts things in drivers/pci to use %pR to printout the
> > > content of a struct resource instead of hand-casted %llx or
> > > other variants.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> >
> > cool!
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > there's also two places in arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c that could use this
> > straight away - see the (untested) patch below.
>
> No, you don't pass it a phys_addr_t or a resource_size_t, you pass it a
> struct resource *

oops ... i only looked at:

+ char sym[4*sizeof(resource_size_t) + 8];

and assumed that it was a resource_size_t printout format :-/

while printing out ranges is useful too, it's by far not the only source
of ugliness all around resource_size_t.

> Now, I would have liked to have a way to print a resource_size_t (or
> phys_addr_t) but that's harder because we need pointers for the magic
> typechecking to work (among others).
>
> Maybe we could create a special format for a
> pointer-to-resource_size_t and pass &foo on callers but that's
> fishy...

would be very nice to just have support for all the native types that
the kernel uses. %pR is still a convenient shortcut.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-10-20 11:07    [W:0.062 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site