Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc8-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 | Date | Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:35:42 +0100 |
| |
On Friday, 18 of January 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > > > Subject : snd_hda_intel 2.6.24-rc2 bug: interrupts don't always work on Lenovo X60s > > > > > Submitter : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> > > > > > Date : 2007-11-08 14:55 > > > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/8/255 > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332 > > > > > Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> > > > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > > > > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 > > > > > > This patch went in, but was reverted because it caused more problems than > > > it fixed. And what it "fixed" was somewhat dubious anyway. > > > > It was reported to break suspend on one box, but Takashi wants it in, > > AFAICS, as quite some time has been invested into figuring out what's > > going wrong in that case. > > since this is about a weird, not fully understood hardware interfacing > and timing problem, and because my original fix was not really a > regression fix (but it indeed _caused_ a real regression in a previously > working setup), i'd lean towards just reverting my patch in .24 and > going with Takashi's fixes in .25. I.e. the current -git status quo.
Agreed.
Rafael
| |