Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:11:55 -0700 | From | "David Rees" <> | Subject | Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) |
| |
On 8/26/07, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote: > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is > a regression field, but there are no difference between > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Here's how to use Bugzilla to track regressions between different kernel versions:
Create a 2.6.22 regression bug and a 2.6.23 regression bug. All regression bugs which are 2.6.22 regression bugs should block the 2.6.22 regression bug. All regression bugs which are 2.6.23 regression bugs should block the 2.6.23 regression bug.
For example, say your master 2.6.22 regression bug tracking bug is #1. When someone comes and files a new bug #2 which is a regression of 2.6.22, make bug #2 block bug #1. Then it is easy to see to track all the 2.6.22 regressions.
To make it easier to remember what bug number tracks regressions for a specific kernel, use a naming convention to create aliases for those bugs.
-Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |