Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:26:48 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 00:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Daniel Walker pisze: > > [snip] > > > Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla? > > > > Yes, I have considered it. > > > > Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is > > a regression field, but there are no difference between > > 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression. > > > > Most people are reporting bugs through LKML: > > - 23 regressions with reference to LKML > > - 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla > > Presumably that's fixable.
I've got some addition grips that I just noticed ..
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8945
I just file the above bugz entry ..
I know who caused the bug , Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com> .. However I can't assign the bug to him. The field was greyed out and forced the assignee as other_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ..
I tryed to CC: eranian@hpl.hp.com , and it said "no match" .. I guess because he doesn't have an account.. So Stephane has no way to know the bug exists , other than me emailing him ..
Also I couldn't check the "Regression" box until after I filed the bug.. It would be nice to file the bug in one action if it's possible .. I don't know bugzilla well enough to know if that's possible tho.
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |