lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:40:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah, i use gnome-terminal exclusively. But testers looking for CFS
> regressions do run every shell on the planet :-)

...and people running older kernels get different results (no surprise)

fwiw, I ran 'top' on 5 terminals with xterm-spam running concurrently
on 2.6.15 (rxvt, pterm, xterm, konsole and gnome-terminal).

For that case, gnome-terminal was definitely the slowest,
and used the most CPU time (more than a factor of three slower
than xterm). konsole was about 2.5, pterm was about the same
as xterm, and rxvt about half the CPU (ymmv).
>
> gnome-terminal is also faster all around (at least on my box):

--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-05 15:43    [W:0.342 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site