Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:39:47 -0400 | From | Thomas Dickey <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18 |
| |
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:40:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > yeah, i use gnome-terminal exclusively. But testers looking for CFS > regressions do run every shell on the planet :-)
...and people running older kernels get different results (no surprise)
fwiw, I ran 'top' on 5 terminals with xterm-spam running concurrently on 2.6.15 (rxvt, pterm, xterm, konsole and gnome-terminal).
For that case, gnome-terminal was definitely the slowest, and used the most CPU time (more than a factor of three slower than xterm). konsole was about 2.5, pterm was about the same as xterm, and rxvt about half the CPU (ymmv). > > gnome-terminal is also faster all around (at least on my box):
-- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |