Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:45:39 +0530 (IST) | From | Satyam Sharma <> | Subject | Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> Sorry for wasting your time. :'( Maybe you can provide your solution > for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree so we can use it > and live happy! :)
Please stop embarrassing me (and yourself).
Sorry, I did lose my patience (others you mention did not) but then that's precisely because of my own _less_ experience, if anything.
No, it's not like I "want to provide my solution for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree" like you wrote above -- I simply identified 4 problem areas in your implementation and wanted them to be addressed. [If you can do so yourself, good enough, otherwise I'm happy to send patch based on your earlier one too -- the modifications I have in mind are few and simple.] I have no personal stake in this PPS stuff anyway, this is just a normal peer review of submissions that should always happen.
Thanks,
Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |