Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:44:57 +0200 | From | Rodolfo Giometti <> | Subject | Re: LinuxPPS & spinlocks |
| |
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:19:48AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> That's just absolute bullshit.
...
> I'm sorry to say this, Rodolfo, but _all_ your arguments above are > *totally* nonsensical and factually incorrect -- and I have had enough of > trying to talk sense to you, it's been ~15 mails in this thread already, > and I've been WASTING my time trying to teach / explain to you, but it's > just *shocking* that you prefer to stick to a wholly incorrect (which I > suspect you've already understood by now anyway) position rather than > just accepting that the present patch is wrong and go about correcting > it instead. > [snip]
Sorry for wasting your time. :'( Maybe you can provide your solution for PPS support and get it included into kernel tree so we can use it and live happy! :)
Several people (Andrew, David, et all) wrote to me a lot of letters without loosing their patience. I'm a poor programmer, not a «guru» like you, and I need more time to understand things. I'm trying to do my best. :)
However I'm very proud to be a "poor programmer" (slow in understanding things) but a gentleman rather than a "kernel-guru" like you but totally ill-mannered.
Thanks anyway for your (precious) time,
Rodolfo
P.S. A gentle programmer just wrote to me a letter where, proposing code/patches, showed to me possible good solutions, so I think I'm going to modify again the locking code soon.
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |