[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Containers: css_put() dilemma
Paul (??) Menage wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Balbir Singh <> wrote:
>> without too much knowledge of each other. BTW, what are the semantics
>> of css_put() is it expected to free the container/run the release agent
>> when the reference count of the container_subsys_state drops to zero?
> If you css_put() the last reference on a subsystem state object and
> the associated container is marked as notify_on_release, then
> check_for_release() is called which does a more full check of whether
> the container is releasable. If it is, a workqueue task is scheduled
> to run the userspace release agent, which can then do anything it
> wants, including potentially deleting the empty container.

Ok.. so my problem still remains, how do I get a non-blocking atomic
reference increment/decrement routine, that would prevent my
container from being deleted?

I don't find cpusets using css_put(). I was hoping that we could
alter css_* would provide the functionality I need.

Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-18 06:33    [W:0.062 / U:3.932 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site