lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Containers: css_put() dilemma
Paul (??) Menage wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds correct. I wonder now if the solution should be some form
>> of delegation for deletion of unreferenced containers (HINT: work queue
>> or kernel threads).
>
> What a great idea. In fact, that's exactly what the release agent
> patch already does.

:-) I should have seen that. I am a little lost thinking that
container_rmdir() and the release agent check_for_release() work
without too much knowledge of each other. BTW, what are the semantics
of css_put() is it expected to free the container/run the release agent
when the reference count of the container_subsys_state drops to zero?


--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-07-17 20:16    [W:0.061 / U:6.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site