lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/4] CONFIG_STABLE: Define it
From
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:54:36 +0200

> b) Of course nobody wants STABLE=n. :-) How about:
>
> config RELEASE
> bool "Build for release"
> help
> If the kernel is declared as a release build here, then
> various checks that are only of interest to kernel development
> will be omitted.

Agreed :-)

>
> c) A drawback of this general option is, it's hard to tell what will be
> omitted in particular.

In that sense it is similar to EMBEDDED, but I still think there
is high value to this, I can already think of several things I
want to put under this which are only noise I want to see during
development periods.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-05-31 11:05    [W:0.221 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site