Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:22:37 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: irda rmmod lockdep trace. | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:50:03 +0200
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:49:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > I would strongly caution against adding any run-time overhead just to > > cure a false lockdep warning. Even adding a new function argument > > is too much IMHO. > > > > Make the cost show up for lockdep only, perhaps by putting each > > hashbin lock into a seperate locking class? > Does that look better to you:
Yes, it does.:) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |