Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v3 - timerfd core ... | From | Nicholas Miell <> | Date | Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:52:57 -0700 |
| |
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 16:50 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote: > You should probably make it behave like the other things that use > itimerspec, just to avoid confusion -- i.e. timers are relative by > default, there's a flag that makes them absolute, they expire when > it_value specifies, and repeat every it_interval nanoseconds if > it_interval is non-zero. > > i.e. > > int timerfd(int ufd, int clockid, int flags, const struct timespec > *utmr); > > with TFD_TIMER_ABS in flags making the timer absolute instead of > relative (and no TFD_TIMER_REL or TFD_TIMER_SEQ at all). >
Sorry, that should be
int timerfd(int ufd, int clockid, int flags, const struct itimerspec *utmr);
and TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME.
-- Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |