[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v3 - timerfd core ...
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote:

> You should probably make it behave like the other things that use
> itimerspec, just to avoid confusion -- i.e. timers are relative by
> default, there's a flag that makes them absolute, they expire when
> it_value specifies, and repeat every it_interval nanoseconds if
> it_interval is non-zero.
> i.e.
> int timerfd(int ufd, int clockid, int flags, const struct timespec
> *utmr);
> with TFD_TIMER_ABS in flags making the timer absolute instead of
> relative (and no TFD_TIMER_REL or TFD_TIMER_SEQ at all).

Sounds sane to me. Will do...

- Davide

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-12 01:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean