[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 6/9] signalfd/timerfd v3 - timerfd core ...
    On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote:

    > You should probably make it behave like the other things that use
    > itimerspec, just to avoid confusion -- i.e. timers are relative by
    > default, there's a flag that makes them absolute, they expire when
    > it_value specifies, and repeat every it_interval nanoseconds if
    > it_interval is non-zero.
    > i.e.
    > int timerfd(int ufd, int clockid, int flags, const struct timespec
    > *utmr);
    > with TFD_TIMER_ABS in flags making the timer absolute instead of
    > relative (and no TFD_TIMER_REL or TFD_TIMER_SEQ at all).

    Sounds sane to me. Will do...

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-03-12 01:19    [W:0.019 / U:3.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site