Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization | Date | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:14:42 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Avi Kivity wrote: > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:39AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> arch/*/kvm/ arch dependent kvm code > >> > > > > Maybe arch/*/virt/ ? No need to add an own directory for each hypervisor. > > > There will be several kvm files in that directory for x86. If you have > just one file, I guess arch/*/virt/kvm.c is okay.
In that case, even arch/*/{mm,kernel}/kvm.c would work fine, as long as you only want to support one hypervisor, or a small set of small files, there is no need to have even have a virt directory.
However, if you want to have symmetry across the architectures, I think arch/*/kvm/ works out best, along the lines of arch/*/{perfmon,crypto,xen,power}. Neither of these is particularly large, but arch/* is typically not that crowded either.
Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |