lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectModule init call vs symbols exporting race?
Hi.

I looked at the sys_init_module() and found that the ->init callback
for the module is called without the module_mutex held and *after*
the module's symbols are exported. Doesn't this create the race when
loading two modules in parallel? Like this.

Consider the first module to be (without any internal locking for
simplicity)

=== foo.c ===
static struct list_head foo_list;

void foo_register(struct list_head *elem)
{
list_add(elem, &foo_list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo_register);

static int foo_init(void)
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&foo_list);
}
module_init(foo_init);
===

and the second one

=== bar.c ===
struct bar_struct {
struct list_head list;
...
} bar;

static int bar_init(void)
{
foo_register(&bar.list);
}
module_init(bar_init);
===

If I understand the sys_init_module() right, the following code
flow is possible:

1CPU 2CPU
sys_init_module(/* foo module */) sys_init_module(/* bar module */)
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
load_module();
/* export the foo_init here */
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
load_module();
/* resolve the foo_init here */
mutex_unlock(&mudule_mutex);
mod->init(); /* bar_init */
/*
* OOPS! The foo_list is not ready yet, because the foo_init
* is not called yet.
*/
mod->init(); /* foo_init... too late */

Is this analysis correct?

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-06 10:59    [W:0.076 / U:1.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site