lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.6.16.37
In-Reply-To: <20070104222517.GL20714@stusta.de>

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:25:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> There's already a CVE number for
> "i386: save/restore eflags in context switch".
>
> Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and
> "x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"?

Sorry, my Web access is broken for now so I can't check, but I believe
that CVE number is for a different, older problem.

So AFAIK there are no CVE numbers for anything I sent (but there
probably should be.) Generic Linux kernel developers don't have
a CVE representative, so we depend on vendors to assign numbers
and sometimes they don't.

--
"That's the problem with non-representational art:
you can't tell which part offends you."
--Stephen Colbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-07 09:43    [W:0.038 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site