[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.
Jan Engelhardt <> writes:

>>Regardless this isn't a case where the C precedence is wrong.
>>"a < b | 1" is an example of C getting the precedence wrong.
> Blame the creator of C.
> But maybe this was intended, since | is a logical operation, as is <,
> while + is an arithmetic one. Programmatically probably not making much
> sense, bitfield |= a < b is one use case.

I do. As I recall the history | and & predate the introduction
of || and && and originally served both functions, so the got
the lower precedence.

>>Having to remember where C is wrong and in what circumstances is
>>harder than just putting in parenthesis.
> The GNU C compiler will warn you where such may happen, but
> currently does so - too bad - only with && and ||.
> c.c:2: warning: suggest parentheses around && within ||

You see my point :) I have better things to worry about
when writing and reviewing code than remember what the
precedence rules are.

Anyway I have figured out how to remove the need for the - 1,
and the trailing empty entries in proc, patch to follow shortly.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-09 04:41    [W:0.040 / U:43.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site