[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:40:51AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The balancing operation is not that frequent and having to treat a special
> > case in the callers would make code more complicated and likely offset the
> > gains in this function.
> This solution as such is not accurate and clean :) and my suggestion is
> not making it any more ugly.
> With increase in NR_CPUS, cost of cpumask operations will increase and
> we shouldn't penalize the other logical threads or cores sharing the caches by
> bringing in unnecessary cache lines.

One cacheline sized 128bytes will support all 1024 cpus that IA64 allows.
cacheline align the cpumask?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-08 22:23    [W:0.042 / U:3.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site