[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first
    Arjan van de Ven wrote:
    > On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:18 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
    >> On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:56:39AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
    >>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:14:22PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
    >>> > Problem:
    >>> > New Dell PowerEdge servers have 2 embedded ethernet ports, which are
    >>> > labeled NIC1 and NIC2 on the chassis, in the BIOS setup screens, and
    >>> > in the printed documentation. Assuming no other add-in ethernet ports
    >>> > in the system, Linux 2.4 kernels name these eth0 and eth1
    >>> > respectively. Many people have come to expect this naming. Linux 2.6
    >>> > kernels name these eth1 and eth0 respectively (backwards from
    >>> > expectations). I also have reports that various Sun and HP servers
    >>> > have similar behavior.
    >>> This came up years back when 2.6 was something new, and the answer
    >>> then was 'bind the interface to the MAC address'.
    >> Both Red Hat-based distros and openSuSE-based distros do something
    >> like this with configuration files automatically. Red Hat's
    >> anaconda/kudzu puts the HWADDR lines in the generated
    >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files. openSuSE's udev rules
    >> puts lines in /etc/udev/rules.d/30-net_persistent_names.rules the
    >> first time it discovers a new interface. Both methods are intended to
    >> maintain a persistent name for each NIC, after being set up the first
    >> time. Neither deals well with replacing one NIC with another - you
    >> must edit the config files.
    >> This works pretty well post-install. It doesn't work well at install
    >> time, all the installers use the kernel's original names, and then
    >> those names become the persistent names in the config files.
    >>> Whilst your patch will fix the case that's currently broken (2.4->2.6),
    >>> doesn't it offer equal possibility to break existing setups when people move
    >>> from <=2.6.18 -> 2.6.19 ?
    >> If they're using config files / udev rules as suggested, it shouldn't
    >> break them.
    >> If they're not, then yes, this could. Debian's
    >> /etc/network/interfaces file allows use of hwaddr fields, though by
    >> default it doesn't appear anything sets it up.
    >> I'm open to suggestions on how *not* to break setups that don't use
    >> the MAC addresses.
    > to be honest I really don't like the PCI ordering change thing for this.
    > It's just too fragile altogether to cause a fixed ordering as you want.
    > Maybe the kernel's initial ordering should do a numeric sort by mac
    > address or something.. (or userspace should)
    That wouldn't match any existing setup, and would be subject to mid-list
    insertions if a NIC were added/replaced. And that is fragile.

    I was looking for an easy way to do PCI slot to MAC, and from there MAC
    to IP, so any NIC plugged into a given slot could be called eth0 (for
    instance) and given the "right" IP address, but that's not easy. Can be
    done with some searching in /sys, but it's non-trivial.

    Bill Davidsen <>
    Obscure bug of 2004: BASH BUFFER OVERFLOW - if bash is being run by a
    normal user and is setuid root, with the "vi" line edit mode selected,
    and the character set is "big5," an off-by-one errors occurs during
    wildcard (glob) expansion.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-11 21:35    [W:0.025 / U:37.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site