[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: A nice CPU resource controller
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:21 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> >
> >> But your implication here is valid. It is better to fiddle with the
> >> dynamic priorities than with nice as this leaves nice for its primary
> >> purpose of enabling the sysadmin to effect the allocation of CPU
> >> resources based on external considerations.
> >
> > I don't understand. It _is_ the administrator fiddling with nice based
> > on external considerations. It just steadies the administrator's hand.
> Not exactly. If "nice" is being (automatically) fiddled to meet some
> measurable requirement such as the amount of CPU tasks get it is no
> longer available as a means for the indication of the relative
> importance of the tasks.

Yeah, I thought about that meanwhile, see other reply.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-31 07:37    [W:0.078 / U:26.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site