lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: A nice CPU resource controller
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 11:07 +1000, Peter Williams wrote:

    > But your implication here is valid. It is better to fiddle with the
    > dynamic priorities than with nice as this leaves nice for its primary
    > purpose of enabling the sysadmin to effect the allocation of CPU
    > resources based on external considerations.

    I don't understand. It _is_ the administrator fiddling with nice based
    on external considerations. It just steadies the administrator's hand.

    -Mike

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-31 06:49    [W:0.022 / U:29.936 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site