Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:54:34 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] |
| |
Hi!
> > > > It's only too slow on swsusp. With Suspend2, I regularly suspend 1GB > > > > images on both my desktop and laptop machines. I agree that it might be > > > > slower on a > > > > uswsusp is as fast as suspend2. It does same LZF compression. > > I agree for uncompressed images - I tried timing the writing of the image > yesterday. I'm not sure about LZF though, because I couldn't get it to > resume. I'd be interested to see it really be as fast as suspend2 with > compression.
Is there any way to help you? I assume normal swsusp resumes okay so it is not driver problem?
> > Do you think you could get some repeatable benchmark for Rafael? He > > worked quite hard on feature only to find out it makes little difference... > > Sure, but it will mean more if all of the tests are run on the same system, so > I'll have another go at getting uswsusp to resume, when I get the chance.
Thanks. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |