Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:22:57 +0200 | From | Jan-Benedict Glaw <> | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
On Mon, 2006-07-24 13:37:13 -0700, Mike Benoit <ipso@snappymail.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 14:06 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > The only other option at that time was to purchase Veritas backup and > its not cheap. We ended up switching to ReiserFS, it increased our > backup/restore time immensely and also bought us about 1year before the > system finally outgrew itself for good. By that time the company could > afford to drop $250,000 on high end backup software so we could grow > past 10TB.
Erm, how does your data look like and why does it require a $250,000 backup solution? Sounds like I'm in the wrong business...
But that's for sure not lkml related...
MfG, JBG
-- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them! the second : [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |