lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 21/61] lock validator: lockdep: add local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() API.

* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> > > Also, trace_irqflags.h doesn't seem an appropriate place for it to
> > > live.
> >
> > seems like the most practical place for it. Previously we had no
> > central include file for irq-flags APIs (they used to be included
> > from asm/system.h and other random per-arch places) -
> > trace_irqflags.h has become the central file now. Should i rename it
> > to irqflags.h perhaps, to not tie it to tracing? We have some
> > deprecated irq-flags ops in interrupt.h, maybe this all belongs
> > there. (although i think it's cleaner to have
> > linux/include/irqflags.h and include it from interrupt.h)
> >
>
> Yes, irqflags.h is nice.

ok, done.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-23 12:28    [W:0.178 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site