Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:20:45 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch 21/61] lock validator: lockdep: add local_irq_enable_in_hardirq() API. |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> > > Also, trace_irqflags.h doesn't seem an appropriate place for it to > > > live. > > > > seems like the most practical place for it. Previously we had no > > central include file for irq-flags APIs (they used to be included > > from asm/system.h and other random per-arch places) - > > trace_irqflags.h has become the central file now. Should i rename it > > to irqflags.h perhaps, to not tie it to tracing? We have some > > deprecated irq-flags ops in interrupt.h, maybe this all belongs > > there. (although i think it's cleaner to have > > linux/include/irqflags.h and include it from interrupt.h) > > > > Yes, irqflags.h is nice.
ok, done.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |