Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:14:16 +0200 | From | maximilian attems <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] klibc |
| |
On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote: > >> > >> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) > >> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \ > >> + !defined(__powerpc64__) > > > > Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ? > > _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some > 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today. > > -hpa
indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.
-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)
is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.
-- maks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |