lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] klibc
On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
> >>
> >> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
> >> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
> >> + !defined(__powerpc64__)
> >
> > Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
>
> _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some
> 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though. I will look at this later today.
>
> -hpa

indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.

-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)

is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.

--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-02 10:18    [W:0.335 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site