Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 04 May 2006 18:58:57 +0400 | From | "Artem B. Bityutskiy" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations |
| |
Pekka Enberg wrote: >> +#ifdef OBSERVE_ASSERTS >> +#define >> ASSERT(EX) \ >> +do >> { >> \ >> + if (unlikely(!(EX))) >> { \ >> + printk(KERN_CRIT "ASSERTION FAILED: %s at %s:%d >> (%s)\n", #EX, \ >> + __FILE__, __LINE__, >> __FUNCTION__); \ >> + >> BUG(); \ >> + >> } \ >> +} while (0) >> +#else >> +#define ASSERT(EX) ; >> +#endif /* OBSERVE_ASSERTS */ > > So, what's wrong with BUG_ON? > I guess because this may be compiled off when no debugging/extra checking is needed.
-- Best regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy Oktet Labs (St. Petersburg), Software Engineer. +7 812 4286709 (office) +7 911 2449030 (mobile) E-mail: dedekind@oktetlabs.ru, Web: www.oktetlabs.ru - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |