lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations
Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> +#ifdef OBSERVE_ASSERTS
>> +#define
>> ASSERT(EX) \
>> +do
>> {
>> \
>> + if (unlikely(!(EX)))
>> { \
>> + printk(KERN_CRIT "ASSERTION FAILED: %s at %s:%d
>> (%s)\n", #EX, \
>> + __FILE__, __LINE__,
>> __FUNCTION__); \
>> +
>> BUG(); \
>> +
>> } \
>> +} while (0)
>> +#else
>> +#define ASSERT(EX) ;
>> +#endif /* OBSERVE_ASSERTS */
>
> So, what's wrong with BUG_ON?
>
I guess because this may be compiled off when no debugging/extra
checking is needed.


--
Best regards, Artem B. Bityutskiy
Oktet Labs (St. Petersburg), Software Engineer.
+7 812 4286709 (office) +7 911 2449030 (mobile)
E-mail: dedekind@oktetlabs.ru, Web: www.oktetlabs.ru
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-04 17:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans