Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Mon, 22 May 2006 10:44:32 -0600 |
| |
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
> Yup. > > Adding 7 extra void*'s seems to affect only dbench, which > whose degration with the nsproxy falls outside the noise. > The odd thing isn't so much the degradation, but the widely > scattered values, compared to without nsproxy.
Well dbench is filesystem heavy so it may have some need to actually be using the filesystem namespace. Although I can't think of why it would. Do you wan to track down that performance regression or do you want to give up on that space optimization for now?
Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |