Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Sun, 21 May 2006 12:08:53 -0600 |
| |
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:
> > Here are the numbers with the basic patchsets. But I guess I should > do another round with adding 7 more void*'s to represent additional > namespaces.
I'm a little slow coming up to speed on these benchmarks. dbench and tbench are measured in megabytes per second correct? kernbench is the number of seconds it takes to compile a kernel? reaim is measured in jobs per minute?
So if I read this right the differences are currently in the noise levels, from your testing.
> (intervals are for 95% CI, tests were each run 15 times) > > | with nsproxy | without nsproxy | > kernbench | 68.90 +/- 0.21 | 69.06 +/- 0.22 | > dbench | 386.0 +/- 26.6 | 388.4 +/- 21.0 | > tbench | 391.6 +/- 8.00 | 389.4 +/- 10.95 | > > reaim with nsproxy > 1 115600.000000 5512.441557 > 3 246985.712000 9375.780582 > 5 272309.092000 8029.833742 > 7 290020.000000 7288.367116 > 9 298591.580000 5557.531915 > 11 nan nan > 13 nan nan > 15 nan nan > > reaim without nsproxy > 1 110160.000000 5728.697311 > 3 246985.712000 9375.780582 > 5 262204.197333 11138.510652 > 7 288660.000000 6880.898412 > 9 300631.580000 4351.926692 > 11 nan nan > 13 nan nan > 15 nan nan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |