Messages in this thread | | | From | Al Boldi <> | Subject | Re: Regression seen for patch "sched:dont decrease idle sleep avg" | Date | Thu, 18 May 2006 07:01:47 +0300 |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote: > How's this look? > --- > The relationship between INTERACTIVE_SLEEP and the ceiling is not perfect > and not explicit enough. The sleep boost is not supposed to be any larger > than without this code and the comment is not clear enough about what > exactly it does, just the reason it does it. > > There is a ceiling to the priority beyond which tasks that only ever sleep > for very long periods cannot surpass. > > Opportunity to micro-optimise and re-use the ceiling variable. > > Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> > > --- > kernel/sched.c | 28 +++++++++++----------------- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-05-17 15:57:49 > +++ linux-2.6.17-rc4-mm1/kernel/sched.c 2006-05-17 18:19:29
Can you post a patch against 2.6.16?
Thanks!
-- Al
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |