lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> we now have that neat polling thing Alan did for interrupts (but which
> is optional). To limp along better the kernel could auto-enable that for
> any such shared interrupt automatically as a "safe fallback"...
> (or heck, if things are this broken, you probably want it for all
> interrupts at that point just to be sure)

That is really something drivers should handle themselves if they are doing
shared edge trigger. For one the kernel core has no idea the right polling
time and for two its often possible to pull dirty tricks to avoid the race.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-24 22:19    [W:2.063 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site