Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:27:17 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview |
| |
* Arjan van de Ven (arjan@infradead.org) wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:32 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes: > > > > > > you must have a good defense against that argument, so I'm curious to > > > hear what it is > > > > [I'm not from the apparmor people but my understanding is] > > > > Usually they claimed name spaces as the reason it couldn't work. > > I actually posted a list of 10 things that I made up in 3 minutes; just > going over those 10 would be a good start already since they're the most > obvious ones..
Yes, the conversation is all over the place. Many of the issues are about some of the uglier parts of the AppArmor code, but the critical issue is simple. Does their protection model actually protect against their threat model. I would really like to see some grounded examples that show whether it's broken or not.
thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |