[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
El 20 Apr 2006 00:32:43 +0200,
Andi Kleen <> escribió:

> Some people claim it will be used in the future in a particular application
> that most people I know don't want to have anything to do with,
> but right now that application uses an own file system that is also unlikely
> to work with selinux or anything so it won't change anything for that.
> I'm not aware of any other proposed application.

However such application may exist in the future (which is why the feature
was implemented, i guess). If AppArmor becomes widespread in the future
(well suse has it anyway so it's already quite widespread) it won't be easy
to create succesful apps which play with namespaces, not to speak that it
won't be possible to "securize" such apps. From my user POV it seems
really weird that a feature forbids you from using another unrelated feature.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-20 01:13    [W:0.156 / U:1.384 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site