[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: optimalisation for strlcpy (lib/string.c)
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Like the other patch (by that other person), I think it is faster to not
> do a strlen first.

Debatable. You've replaced a call to the highly-optimized memcpy function
with a byte-by-byte copy. It's probably a wash performance wise (have you
benchmarked?) and is certainly less clear.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-10 22:39    [W:0.043 / U:1.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site