[lkml]   [2006]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: optimalisation for strlcpy (lib/string.c)
> > Like the other patch (by that other person), I think it is faster to not
> > do a strlen first.
> Debatable. You've replaced a call to the highly-optimized memcpy function
> with a byte-by-byte copy. It's probably a wash performance wise (have you
> benchmarked?) and is certainly less clear.

I tested it outside the kernel.
The test source can be found here:

Folkert van Heusden

Feeling generous? ->
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-12-10 22:43    [W:0.042 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site