Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:47:19 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Updated, add get_range, allows a hyhpenated range to get_options |
| |
Derek Fults wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:25 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Derek Fults wrote: >>> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:52 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> Derek Fults wrote: >>>>> This allows a hyphenated range of positive numbers M-N, in the string >>>>> passed to command line helper function, get_options. This will expand >>>>> the range and insert the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in >>>>> get_options. >>>>> >>>>> Currently the command line option "isolcpus=" takes as its argument a >>>>> list of cpus. >>>>> Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number> >>>>> This can get extremely long when isolating the majority of cpus on a >>>>> large system. Valid values of <cpu_number> include all cpus, 0 to >>>>> "number of CPUs in system - 1". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Derek Fults <dfults@sgi.com> >>>>> >>>>> Index: linux/lib/cmdline.c >>>>> =================================================================== >>>>> --- linux.orig/lib/cmdline.c 2006-09-19 22:42:06.000000000 -0500 >>>>> +++ linux/lib/cmdline.c 2006-11-01 12:36:20.059166727 -0600 >>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@ >>>>> #include <linux/kernel.h> >>>>> #include <linux/string.h> >>>>> >>>>> +/** >>>>> + * If a hyphen was found in get_option, this will handle the >>>>> + * range of numbers, M-N. This will expand the range and insert >>>>> + * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options. >>>>> + */ >>>> Derek, >>>> Thanks for persisting thru this. It's all fine for me except the >>>> comment block above. If a comment block begins with "/**", then >>>> it's supposed to be in kernel-doc format (see >>>> Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt), with function name & >>>> parameters (if applicable). However, that mostly needs to be done >>>> for non-static functions, so probably just change /** to /* >>>> and leave the rest of the comment block as is. >>>> My other comment-block comment was also about kernel long-comment >>>> style, which is >>>> /* >>>> * begin >>>> * more >>>> * end >>>> */ >>>> so now you have achieved that also, so thanks again. >>> I fixed both comments to match that format. Thanks for all the help and >>> your patience. >>> I'm posting the new patch in this replay. Is that an acceptable >>> practice, or does one normally post all fixes to a patch in a new >>> message? >> It happens both ways, but since this is mostly new code/feature, >> I suggest that you repost it and also cc: akpm@osdl.org on it. >> >> And it still needs a user. Will you be converting isolcpus= >> to use this functionality? >> It likely won't be merged until it has a user. >> > Isolcpus will be using this code, but it does not need to be converted > in the kernel. Isolated_cpu_setup() gets its string from the command > line and then makes the call to get_options with that string. There is
Ack that.
> a reference to the format of isolcpus= in kernel-parameters.txt, that > could reflect this enhancement. > Instead of: > Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number> > > change to: > Format <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>-<cpu number> > <cpu number>-<cpu number> must be a positive range in ascending order.
Can you make that change too, please?
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |