Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Updated, add get_range, allows a hyhpenated range to get_options | From | Derek Fults <> | Date | Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:51:02 -0600 |
| |
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 12:25 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Derek Fults wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:52 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> Derek Fults wrote: > >>> This allows a hyphenated range of positive numbers M-N, in the string > >>> passed to command line helper function, get_options. This will expand > >>> the range and insert the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in > >>> get_options. > >>> > >>> Currently the command line option "isolcpus=" takes as its argument a > >>> list of cpus. > >>> Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number> > >>> This can get extremely long when isolating the majority of cpus on a > >>> large system. Valid values of <cpu_number> include all cpus, 0 to > >>> "number of CPUs in system - 1". > >>> > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Derek Fults <dfults@sgi.com> > >>> > >>> Index: linux/lib/cmdline.c > >>> =================================================================== > >>> --- linux.orig/lib/cmdline.c 2006-09-19 22:42:06.000000000 -0500 > >>> +++ linux/lib/cmdline.c 2006-11-01 12:36:20.059166727 -0600 > >>> @@ -16,6 +16,23 @@ > >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> > >>> #include <linux/string.h> > >>> > >>> +/** > >>> + * If a hyphen was found in get_option, this will handle the > >>> + * range of numbers, M-N. This will expand the range and insert > >>> + * the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options. > >>> + */ > >> Derek, > >> Thanks for persisting thru this. It's all fine for me except the > >> comment block above. If a comment block begins with "/**", then > >> it's supposed to be in kernel-doc format (see > >> Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt), with function name & > >> parameters (if applicable). However, that mostly needs to be done > >> for non-static functions, so probably just change /** to /* > >> and leave the rest of the comment block as is. > >> My other comment-block comment was also about kernel long-comment > >> style, which is > >> /* > >> * begin > >> * more > >> * end > >> */ > >> so now you have achieved that also, so thanks again. > > > > I fixed both comments to match that format. Thanks for all the help and > > your patience. > > I'm posting the new patch in this replay. Is that an acceptable > > practice, or does one normally post all fixes to a patch in a new > > message? > > It happens both ways, but since this is mostly new code/feature, > I suggest that you repost it and also cc: akpm@osdl.org on it. > > And it still needs a user. Will you be converting isolcpus= > to use this functionality? > It likely won't be merged until it has a user. > Isolcpus will be using this code, but it does not need to be converted in the kernel. Isolated_cpu_setup() gets its string from the command line and then makes the call to get_options with that string. There is a reference to the format of isolcpus= in kernel-parameters.txt, that could reflect this enhancement. Instead of: Format: <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>
change to: Format <cpu number>,...,<cpu number>-<cpu number> <cpu number>-<cpu number> must be a positive range in ascending order.
Derek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |