Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:31:11 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Potential fix for fdtable badness. |
| |
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:08:18 -0700 Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> Would you prefer me to resend a fixed patch #4, or a new fix (#5) on top of > what's in your tree?
Incremental updates are preferred.
> diff -Npru old/fs/file.c new/fs/file.c > --- old/fs/file.c 2006-10-10 18:58:21.000000000 -0700 > +++ new/fs/file.c 2006-10-10 19:01:03.000000000 -0700 > @@ -164,9 +164,8 @@ static struct fdtable * alloc_fdtable(un > * the fdarray into page-sized chunks: starting at a quarter of a page, > * and growing in powers of two from there on. > */ > - nr++; > nr /= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *)); > - nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr); > + nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr + 1); > nr *= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *)); > if (nr > NR_OPEN) > nr = NR_OPEN;
Like that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |