lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: revert yenta free_irq on suspend
From
Date
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 23:03 -0400, ambx1@neo.rr.com wrote:

> Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power
> management, the more likely APM will break. This may be technically
> unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks. I agree with
> Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices
> may still need to be disabled by the OS. As a real world example,
> we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM
> on a couple of older laptops.

Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that
actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-01 10:58    [W:0.099 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site