lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: revert yenta free_irq on suspend
Hi!

> > Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power
> > management, the more likely APM will break. This may be technically
> > unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks. I agree with
> > Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices
> > may still need to be disabled by the OS. As a real world example,
> > we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM
> > on a couple of older laptops.
>
> Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that
> actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ?

Well, you probably don't want to free IRQ that is used for wakeup; but
if driver is used for wakeup, it probably needs some special handling,
anyway (right?).
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-08-02 13:23    [W:0.047 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site