Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:11:09 -0500 | From | David Masover <> | Subject | Re: reiser4 plugins |
| |
Adrian Ulrich wrote: >>so all we have left is the issue of whether using /meta costs us >>performance, or whether breaking POSIX to add a symlink (such as >>foo/...) really gives us that much more usability. > > > IMHO '/meta' isn't such a good idea, because a chrooted application > won't be able to use it.
mount --bind. Is there a performance hit for having too many of those?
mount --bind /meta/vfs/some/chroot /some/chroot/meta
Also, maybe a separately-mounted /meta, maybe with something like '-o root='
I can't think of when you'd have a chrooted application that uses /meta, but wasn't written with /meta in mind, so as to have these mount commands in its init scripts.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |