Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:01:22 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags |
| |
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >>processes 1 2 3 4 > >> > >>2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500 > >>no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500 > >> > >>Numbers are MB/s, higher is better. > > > > > >what type of network was used - localhost or a real one? > > > > Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the > erratic behaviour without wake affine.
yeah - fine enough. (It's not representative for IO workloads, but it's representative for local IPC workloads, just wanted to know precisely which workload it is.)
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |