lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Delete scheduler SD_WAKE_AFFINE and SD_WAKE_BALANCE flags
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>>processes 1 2 3 4
>>
>>2.6.13-rc4: 187, 183, 179 260, 259, 256 340, 320, 349 504, 496, 500
>>no wake-bal: 180, 180, 177 254, 254, 253 268, 270, 348 345, 290, 500
>>
>>Numbers are MB/s, higher is better.
>
>
> what type of network was used - localhost or a real one?
>

Localhost. Yeah it isn't a real world test, but it does show the
erratic behaviour without wake affine.

I don't have a setup with multiple fast network adapters otherwise
I would have run a similar test using a real network.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-29 11:03    [W:0.049 / U:11.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site