Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 07 May 2005 12:51:41 +0200 | From | Jan Dittmer <> | Subject | Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering |
| |
Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:36:26AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > >>On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:26:32AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>>Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:38:12PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate level of >>>> > visibility on this mailing list? >>>> >>>> Looking at the http://l4x.org/k/ site, it appears that all -mm versions >>>> have broken ARM support with the defconfig, while Linus kernels at least >>>> build fine.
Sorry for tapping in so late. I don't follow lkml that close. For some time I thought about providing semi-automatic mails of what architectures broke/ got fixed from one version to another, tracking mm/rc/git(?). Would that be useful?
-- Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |