Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:52:21 -0700 | From | Mark Fasheh <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking |
| |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:12AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Why don't you try it, and post the numbers?
*Sigh*
Done from a test machine I have over here on a two node cluster. I rebooted and re-formatted between tests.
* Without LKM_LOCAL: [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
real 0m39.699s user 0m3.644s sys 0m8.076s
* With LKM_LOCAL [root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz
real 0m22.076s user 0m3.869s sys 0m7.234s
So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :) --Mark
-- Mark Fasheh Senior Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |