lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1a/7] dlm: core locking
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:12AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Why don't you try it, and post the numbers?

*Sigh*

Done from a test machine I have over here on a two node cluster.
I rebooted and re-formatted between tests.

* Without LKM_LOCAL:
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz

real 0m39.699s
user 0m3.644s
sys 0m8.076s


* With LKM_LOCAL
[root@ca-test7 ocfs2]# time tar -zxf /tmp/linux-2.6.11.7.tar.gz

real 0m22.076s
user 0m3.869s
sys 0m7.234s

So yes, I'd say it's worth a significant amount of performance to us :)
--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@oracle.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-04-29 23:57    [W:0.446 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site